🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed seats for Māori representatives on NZ local authorities will be slashed by over 50%, after a controversial law change that required local governments to submit the fate of hard-won Indigenous wards to a popular referendum.

Background Information on Māori Wards

Māori wards, which may have one or more councillors based on demographic data, were established in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the option to vote for a guaranteed Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Initially, local governments were only able to create a Indigenous seat by first putting it to a public vote in their area. Communities frequently spent years generating local support and pushing their local governments to create Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the previous Labour government allowed municipal authorities to establish a Māori ward without initially mandating them to put it to a public vote.

However, this year, the current administration overturned the policy, stating communities should decide whether to establish Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change mandated councils that had established a electoral district under the previous policy to conduct decisive public votes concurrently with the municipal polls, which concluded on 11 October. Of 42 councils taking part in the public vote, 17 voted to keep their seats, and 25 to abolish theirs – showing many regions against guaranteed Māori representation.

The results provided “a vital step in restoring community self-determination.”

Critics however have criticised the new policy as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the current administration has implemented sweeping rollbacks to policies intended to improve Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has stated it wants to terminate “race-based” policies, and asserts it is committed to enhancing results for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the public votes were split down urban-rural lines – most cities required to vote supported Māori wards, while rural regions leaned strongly towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had only just come in – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Concerns

This year’s local government elections registered the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with under one-third of citizens casting a vote, prompting calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a mockery”.

Comparative Treatment

Councils are permitted to establish other types of wards – such as countryside seats – without initially mandating a community ballot. The disparate requirements placed on Indigenous representation suggested the administration was singling out Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This statement referred to the 17 regions that chose to keep their wards.